Menu
Home
 News
 Surveys
 Feedback
 Submit News
 Private Messages
Community
 Forums
 Your_Account
 Recommend_Us
 Chat
Players Haven
 Narfell Map
 Narfell Wiki
Information
 Reviews
 Journal
 Web_Links
 Narfell FAQ
 Encyclopedia
Content
 Topics
 Search
 Statistics
 Members_List
 Stories_Archive

     Languages
Select Interface Language:


     Who's Online
There are currently, 11 guest(s) and 15 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Narfell Campaign :: View topic - Guideline for Animal Empathy
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log inLog in 

Guideline for Animal Empathy

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Narfell Campaign Forum Index -> New Adventurer's Inn
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
LowerDenizen
Narfell DM
Narfell DM


Joined: Apr 14, 2004
Posts: 1978
Location: Somewhere

PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 4:04 pm    Post subject: Guideline for Animal Empathy Reply with quote

Since I have been asked about this in the past, and again more recently with a demand for a post of rules regarding AE, here we go. Other DMs feel free to post their thoughts as well.

There is no line regarding AE and what is accepted and what is not accepted, you should use common sense.

That being said, the number one reason that people give when confronted with the way they use AE is: "Well the game let's me do it, that's why I did it." Since exploits can fall under those exact same reasons, and we ban for exploiting, let me try to explain the issue with AE so that those new to how it works (as well as long term users) can understand some of the DM stance.

I have two issues with Animal Empathy. 1. It does not use Empathy, it dominates. Dominating is a magical ability and/or spell, not a skill check. 2. The skill rolls are rigged, because most people will get a natural 20 unless spotted by a hostile animal due to not being in combat, allowing for the maximum HD animal each time. This implies little to no risk against the PC, and I am all about the risk to a PC when going for a reward such as that.

1. This one is fairly self explanatory for the most part. You get a free pet that attacks anything in your path. Why is this wrong? Go out in real life, sneak up to a dog, then lunge from the bushes and hug him. Even if you are "good with pets" the dog isn't going to like it. Especially if it's a mean dog already who was growling and snapping at people. If you're lucky, he'll calm down, if your not, he'll rip your face off. He will not suddenly heel to your side and follow you everywhere and attack those you point at. Seriously, I'm not lying here.

2. Narfell already has modified rules regarding animal companions at low levels. You can't get a bear until level 4. But with AE you can get a bear at level 1 with enough points. We don't let you get the bear companion because it's deemed to be overpowered, why would it be alright to get a bear at level 1 using a skill check?

So, the next question would be, "Why is it allowed then?" Because AE in theory is a wonderful tool for RP. You can calm animals, and try to pacify hostile growling beasts. People have been lucky that over the years there have been a number of people that RP'd it so well, that it was deemed to be worth more in then the alternative, which is to have it removed.

NWN has it scripted to act the way it does, and for the most part, here and there, we ignore the extra companion bit, because it does give a little padding, and it does involve putting points in something. So when does it become over the line?

This is what I personally watch for. If someone enters an area that is well above their challenge level, and immediately sneaks up and AE's an animal. That's a warning to me. If they then proceed to use that animal to clear the map stopping only to haul said animal to an out of the way place to "put it out of its misery" before getting a new animal, that is over the line.

If a group's "plan" for a map is "we'll have the ranger/druid AE a tank" and that's pretty much it... that's over the line. If there is no RP involved especially so. If the removal of the one AEd animal so far tips the scales that the entire party would be wiped, then chances are you should not be doing that.

As rangers/druids your character should be respecting animal and plant life as much if not more then your own PCs life (yes, I am sure there are some few exceptions), but forcing an animal into combat until it's almost dead and then killing it in a quiet corner -will- take explaining.
_________________
My friends call me.. Mr. Obvious.
Still not sure why.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Zeldor
Narfell Commoner
Narfell Commoner


Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Posts: 72
Location: Nebraska, USA

PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 9:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the clarification...Zeldor was definately out of line and now stands corrected...Grrrr....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Black Rider
Narfell DM
Narfell DM


Joined: Nov 07, 2003
Posts: 2400
Location: Oporto, Portugal

PostPosted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 3:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wow great post LD!
great point of views (imo) and a great guide line for all who are thinking about creating a druid/ranger char or already play one, grats!

________________________________________________________´
KULL (Half Orc Barbarian, Training Officer and Major in the Legion)


To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of the women!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
duncangoldeneye
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Oct 25, 2007
Posts: 1
Location: Saskatchewan

PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 9:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for clearing that up. Now that you have explained it, I see how Animal Empathy could be used for exploit purposes. Not something I would have seen before, because I honestly did not find it anywhere near that powerful in NWN OC.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
biglilb
Narfell Noble
Narfell Noble


Joined: Aug 25, 2007
Posts: 144
Location: Iowa

PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 10:31 am    Post subject: Good post easy to understand Reply with quote

Thanks for the post.. Puts things in place for Ae, A better understanding of the gift..


THANKS *SMILES*
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
yertelturtle
Lifeless Narfeller
Lifeless Narfeller


Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Posts: 1034
Location: Pinos Altos, or close to it

PostPosted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 8:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ld maybe you can speak to this.. I play a priestess who's goddess is Adrie Faenya.. the only book I've ever read with this in it the priestess could speak avian but had no special influence over them.. so I've been rping she speaks only avian (well and her other langs) .. wrong?.. it doens't give her any undue advantage I think?
_________________
----------------------------------------------------------
The floggings will continue until moral improves
I love Humanity, it's People I can't stand.
Anti-war, Pro-orgasim
-----------------------------------------------------------
characters:
Feather - She who loves the people.
Amywen Galpin - Trust no one!
Calia Kalin - Circled.
Alana Ampheran - Of spell and sword
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Zyphlin
Narfell Loremaster


Joined: Nov 20, 2003
Posts: 5275
Location: Near DC, in Virginia

PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 3:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bumped but unstickied
_________________
Gone in the Shadows
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Narfell Campaign Forum Index -> New Adventurer's Inn All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001-2003 phpBB Group
phpBB port v2.0.7 based on Tom Nitzschner's phpbb2.0.6 upgraded to phpBB 2.0.7 standalone was developed and tested by:
ChatServ, mikem,
and Paul Laudanski (aka Zhen-Xjell).

Version 2.0.7 by Nuke Cops © 2004 http://www.nukecops.com




All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2007 by Narfell.

press press

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2004 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.
Page Generation: 0.20 Seconds